7-10: Cellulase engineering from invidiual, cocktail, cellulosome to cell-surface display

Monday, April 30, 2012
Napoleon Ballroom C-D, 3rd fl (Sheraton New Orleans)
Y.-H. Percival Zhang1, Xiaozhou Zhang2, Chun You3, Hehuan Liao1 and Hui Ma2, (1)Biological Systems Engineering Department, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, VA, (2)Gate Fuels Inc, Blacksburg, VA, (3)Biological Systems Engineering Department, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA
Cellulase remains to be one of the most costly expenditures in biomass biorefineries. However, the complicated relationship among heterogeneity of solid substrates, different action-mode cellulase components, and competitive/synergetic actions of cellulases on surface-limited substrate result in great challenges in cellulase engineering [1]. Here we present our efforts in bacterial cellulase engineering. Since cellulase activities on synthetic soluble substrates have no relationship with their activities on natural substrates [2, 3], we developed a simple and high-efficiency transformation system based on Bacillus subtilis that can secrete ample cellulases to media [4].  By applying this new platform, we have succeeded in greatly enhancing the activities of glycoside hydrolase family 5 endoglucanse and family 9 processive endoglucanase on solid cellulosic substrate.   We also investigated the cocktails of bacterial family 5 endoglucanase, family 9 endoglucanase and family 48 cellobiohydrolase.  A linkage of several cellulase components by a mini-scaffoldin can enhance their performance by ca two-fold.  Furthermore, the diasply of mini-cellulosome on the surface of B.subtilis exhibited another several-fold activity enhancements.  Our research results suggest that cellulolytic bacteria utilize the cell-associated cellulosome strategy to overcome their relatively low activity cellulase components [5].  Also, we will report our advances in CBP bacillus strains.  

1.         Zhang et al. Biotechnol. Adv., 2006. 24(5): 452-481.

2.         Liu et al.  et al. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2009. 103: 1087-1094.

3.         Liu et al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2010. 76(14): 4914-4917.

4.         Zhang et al. Microb. Biotechnol., 2011. 4: p. 98-105.

5.         You, C., et al.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2012: accepted.

See more of: Poster Session 1
See more of: General Submissions