Monday, July 30, 2007 - 11:15 AM
S18

Challenges and Cost Impacts Associated with Chlorinated Solvent Bioremediation in Groundwater

Robert D. Norris and Bruce Alleman. Enviornmental Services, Brown and Caldwell, 532 Rider Ridge Drive, Longmont, CO 80501

Chlorinated solvent bioremediation in groundwater is proven effective and cost efficient.  Reductive biologically-based technologies including biostimulation, bioaugmentation, and/or monitored natural attenuation (MNA), alone or in combination, may be appropriate for a given site.  The first two approaches rely on effective delivery of a suitable electron donor, which typically drives the cost.  The challenge is to distribute the donor across the targeted volume of the aquifer to provide sufficient contact and mixing with the contaminant needed to effect degradation.  MNA might be an effective strategy for cost containment, especially when used as a polishing step and/or to address the distal points of the plume, but this approach has its own set of challenges.

 

Bioremediation selection, design, and optimization must consider site-specific cost-impacting factors including the depth to the plume, aquifer hydraulic and geochemical properties, contaminant mass and distribution, presence of co-contaminants, required cleanup level, and physical/ logistical constraints of the site.  Many of these factors impact any given in-situ technology, however, impacts on the distribution of microorganisms and/or supporting remedial reagents could raise the cost.  Frequently there is a trade off between capital and operating costs, with the general rule being to minimize the life-cycle costs rather than the initial-capital costs.  Another strategy to significantly reduce remediation costs is to negotiate risk-based remedial objectives as an alternative endpoint to drinking water standards.  This paper will discuss these and other key factors that impact enhanced bioremediation costs and approaches for optimizing the remedial strategy to minimize those impacts.